Is Jesus the Human One?

Are you on the path to becoming a fully alive human being like Jesus was?

by Carl Gregg

Gospel Reading: Mark 8:31-38

For Sunday, March 4, 2012: Year B — Lent 2 

The verses preceding this Gospel lesson are a climax in Mark’s Gospel. Jesus asks the disciples, “Who do you say that I am?” Peter answers, “You are the Messiah.” Rather than commending Peter, Jesus prohibits them from speaking about him (perhaps because they misunderstood him).

“Christ” Is Not Jesus’ Last Name

In our opening verse, Jesus does not echo Peter’s word “Messiah,” but instead refers to himself as “the Son of Man.” The Hebrew word mashiach (literally “anointed one”) is transliterated into English as messiah. It was translated into Greek as christos, which was transliterated into English as “Christ.” So, messiah = anointed one = Christ.

Thus, at one level, anyone who has been ritually anointed is a messiah. To name only a few examples, in Leviticus 4:3, we read about the “anointed priest” or “messianic priest.” In 1 Samuel 24:7 and 2 Samuel 1:14, Saul and David respectively are called “the Lord’s anointed” or “the Lord’s messiah.” In Isaiah 45:1, the foreign King Cyrus of Persia (modern Iran!) is even called a “messiah” or “anointed one” for ending the Babylonian Captivity.

How is it that have we misunderstood the term messiah? And why do many Christians almost exclusively emphasize Jesus Christ, neglecting a title Jesus repeatedly calls himself: “Son of Man?”

“Son of Man” or “Human One?”

The Common English Bible recently made headlines for its decision to translate “Son of Man” as “Human One.” If the disciples did not at first “get” who Jesus was, perhaps we can get clarity from later writers such as the early church father Irenaeus who said, “The glory of God is the human being fully alive!” We could accordingly hear the “Human One” as Jesus saying, “I am a human who is fully alive.

Why then would Jesus accuse Peter of “setting your mind not on divine things but on human things?” Peter wants to protect Jesus from the messiness and risk that is essential to the human condition. Jesus rebukes Peter for “merely human” beliefs, whereas we are called to a God-infused, grace-filled abundant life. [Read more...]

Murder and Mayhem

Giving up the whole God-is-a-bastard thing.

By Debbie Blue

Gospel Reading: Matthew 22: 1-14

For Sunday, October 9, 2011: Year A—Ordinary 28

This parable is scary and violent. The king is petty, murderous and arbitrarily cruel. Who would want to go to his party?

Boycott and Resist

But people don’t normally refuse an offer from a king (or Don Corleone)– even an awful paranoid king like Herod the Great who had little babies slaughtered, according to Matthew, executed his wife and sons according to Josephus (Caesar Augustus said, “it is better to be Herod’s pig than his son”). That the characters in this story boycott the king makes them seem a little brave.

Some hearers of this story must have been attracted to the characters that refuse to dance when the king calls. Their kings were minions of the Roman Empire and they weren’t very nice. The way of God’s people has always been to resist the summons of worldly power. I feel a little sorry for the king that no one wanted to come to his party, but he is a bully. I like The Resistance.

Choking on the Fat Calf

But then the rebels disappoint. They treat the king’s slaves shamefully and kill them. No one looks very good in this story. It’s a familiar one.

[Read more...]

What Good Does This Parable Do?

Where do we find the Good News here?

 by Russell Rathbun

Gospel Reading: Matthew 21:33-46

For Sunday, October 2, 2011: Year A-Ordinary 27

Matthew is on a rampage, or Matthew’s Jesus is on a rampage. Brace yourselves, for these next two weeks are filled with murders, miserable death, the burning of cities, the outer darkness, and of course, the weeping and gnashing of teeth. All this seems a little over the top, like, Matthew really dislike the chief priests.

Deconstructing Violence?

These parables against the chief priests are hard to feel right about in our context or their assumed original context. I would like to find a way that to interpret this week’s reading in a way that deconstructs all this violent imagery and doesn’t so strongly scapegoat one particular group of people, but Matthew leaves very little room for interpretation.

 Jesus says to the chief priests, this means the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to another people. And then Matt, just to drive the point home even further, writes, when the chief priests and the Pharisees heard his parables, they realized he was speaking about them.

Pushing It

O.K. I get that in Matthew’s story-world the Jewish religious leaders are the bad guys. I am sure that, as a tax collector, Matthew, had always been treated as a sinner and a pariah by them. So he was a little bitter, he had some baggage, but this seems to push beyond the pale even of parable-type justice.

[Read more...]

The Parable Trap

Is the Pharisee’s self-justification built on the Law or his comparison to others?

by Russell Rathbun

Gospel Reading: Luke 18:9-14

For Sunday, Oct. 24, 2010: Year C – Ordinary 30

Jesus continues with his qualifications of prayer parables this week. But first the author of Luke messes with our heads a little bit. Not only do we get more of the tumbling logic of the-first-shall-be-last-but-the-last-are-first variety, but this entire pericope is set up to contradict its implied central point.

Contemptuous Regard

Before I get into that fun at the end, I want to begin with, well, the beginning (if that’s OK). I don’t know what to make of, “He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous and regarded others with contempt . . . .Does that mean that he was telling the previous parables to people who regarded others with contempt, and now tells them this one?

That would include the both the Pharisees and the disciples. Is Luke purposely equating the two groups? Is there something about being a religious leader that makes one susceptible to self-righteousness and contempt for others? (Sorry, that’s really an obvious statement placed in the form of a question in an attempt to distance myself from its sting.)

[Read more...]

Prayer Saves Lives?

Is Jesus tying faith to our persistence?

by Russell Rathbun

Gospel Reading: Luke 18:1-8

For Sunday, Oct. 17, 2010: Year C - Ordinary 29

I beseech you therefore brethren and sister by the mercy of God, to hold on a minute. Back up a little bit. The Gospel text for this week is very good. There is plenty of meat chew on (or tofurkey if you prefer). But somewhere between Week 28 and Week 29 the world ends. The Lectionariers kind of left that part out.

Just in Time for Halloween

The pericope between the Healing of the Ten Lepers and the Parable of the Persistent Widow starts with Jesus being addressed, almost casually, “Once Jesus was asked by the Pharisee when the kingdom of God was coming.” It ends with the creepy, just-in-time-for-Halloween, “Where the corpse is, there the vultures will gather.”

[Read more...]

Year C – Ordinary 26 Video Response

Where is the Good Guy?

Is this about the unjust economy of the world, about idolatry, or the ability to put myself above them?

by Russell Rathbun

Gospel Reading: Luke 16:1-13

For Sunday, Sept. 19, 2010: Year C - Ordinary 25

Can we agree to have a Hardest Question holiday? We could piggyback on Labor Day. Let’s skip the hard stuff and go straight to the end of this reading. Verse 13 can preach—easily. No one can serve two masters. You cannot serve God and wealth. Okay, go! We might not even need notes for this one.

But it seems to me that hard is the point of this parable and Jesus’ interpretation of it. Jesus builds a trap for his hearers based on common notions of narrative expectations, identifications, justice and self-justification.

Harder for Some

Verse 1 says that Jesus’ audience is the disciples, but verse 14 tells us that the Pharisees heard all this, and they ridiculed him. I’m thinking this whole pericope is the biblical version of a stage whisper: Jesus addresses the disciples, but it is all meant for the Pharisees.

[Read more...]

Year C: Ordinary 25 Video Response

The Land of Rich Men

Can I be honest about my desire for material abundance and the security it promises?

by Russell Rathbun

Gospel Reading: Luke 12:13-21

For Sunday, August 1, 2010: Year C - Ordinary 18

I don’t see the problem here. It was a bumper crop, a good year. What does a farmer do with a bumper crop, puts it in the barn. That done, he relaxes. He can afford to. He has earned his contentment. His soul is happy and then he dies. Isn’t that the way it is supposed to be?

A Cartoon Fool?

I feel two ways about this text: It is too easy and it is too hard. It is too easy to make the rich farmer into a cartoon fool. I love to find a reason to say that rich people are bad as much as the next gal; but maybe he is no different than the Norwegian bachelor farmer character Garrison Keillor often makes reference to. He is alone on his land; he works hard, is frugal and finds pleasure in a good yield and a full barn. Simple pleasures really. Seemingly not a life full of relationships, but maybe the abundant life looks different to some folks.

There is no indication that the farmer is a bad man, that he is cheating anyone, or breaking any laws. But he is characterized as greedy, because he has a lot and he is keeping it all for himself when there are many in need. He tears down and builds bigger. All these things are abhorrent to my liberal sensibilities. I bet he is not even an organic farmer. To get such an abundant crop, he must be planting genetically modified grains. He should be focusing on the spiritual not just the physical.

The parable is prophetic word for the rich.

[Read more...]