A Breath of Fresh Air

Resisting the temptation to make Paul one-sided.

by Michael Danner

Epistle Reading: 1 Thessalonians 3:9-13

For Sunday, December 2, 2012; Year C—Advent 1

The Apostle Paul was a passionate defender of the faith. He dismantled error with a razor-like intellect. His reasoning abilities, top-notch. His style was in-your-face, no-holds-bared, truth-telling. He never backed down from a good debate (argument?). It was often his way or the highway (just ask Peter, Barnabas, and John Mark to name just a few).

And yet, this is not all there is to Paul. As a matter of observation, it appears to me as if Paul mellowed the further he got away from his Pharisaical roots and the closer he walked with the crucified Jesus. In Paul’s letters, we encounter Paul as an exceptional and thoughtful mentor who cared deeply about people, their profession and their practice of the faith. [Read more...]

Reading the Bible with Jews

 Are we saved not by faith or belief, but by Jesus’ faithfulness?

by Carl Gregg

Epistle Reading: Romans 4:13-25

 For Sunday, March 4, 2012: Year B — Lent 2

Many Christians have begun to have ears to hear the rightful Jewish protests that “law” is a problematic translation of “Torah.” “Teaching” or “Instruction” are preferable options. In our context, the word “law” imports all the negative baggage associated with the bulky U.S. Law Code.

Do You Hear “Torah” or “Law?”

Landmark books such as E.P. Sanders’ Paul and Palestinian Judaism (1977) emphasize that many Jews view the Torah not as a burden, but as God’s gracious gift of a covenant and way of life. Sanders was a leader in studying what Jews in and around the first-century said about themselves compared to the increasingly anti-Semitic Christian rhetoric about Jews. The “New Perspective on Paul” seeks to understand Paul in his authentic Jewish context instead of through the lens of Christian theologians such as Augustine (354-430) and Luther (1483-1546).

The Jewish Annotated New Testament argues that the word “law,” such as in verse 13 (Greek: nomos, without a definite article), often refers not to the “Torah,” but to Roman law (see the burgeoning field of Empire-critical interpretation) or Jewish “conventions” such as circumcision.

Do You Hear “Faith” or “Faithfulness?”

This commentary also invites us to hear the word “faith” (Greek: pistis) as more about faithfulness than “faith,” especially as opposed to faith heard with the connotation of “belief.” (Remember complications such as Romans 2:13, “doers of the law will be justified,” which challenge simplistic portrayals of justification by faith alone.) Thus, in verses 20-21, “Paul is defining a continuum of decisions and concomitant actions based on trust in God’s promises…. Paul may be alluding to Abraham’s willingness to be circumcised as an act of faithfulness toward being able to father this promised child.” Like the Christians in Rome to whom Paul was writing, we are called to similar faithfulness. [Read more...]

Thessalonian Comfort

Do Paul’s words still solace today?

 

by Lauren F. Winner

Epistle Reading: 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18

For Sunday, November 6, 2011: Year A – Ordinary 32

Someone in the Thessalonian community died before Jesus had returned—that’s the situation that occasioned this portion of Paul’s letter.

That’s Not Supposed to Happen!

One can imagine the Thessalonian wife or child or husband, not only beset by the sorrow of loss, but also knocked down by theological confusion­—this wasn’t supposed to happen.  That new widow or widower insisted—the Lord is returning, he was going to return so soon, before anyone could take ill and die.

In the face of this Paul offers comfort—calm, steady comfort. “For we believe that Jesus died and rose again, and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in him”—even those who died before Jesus’ return.

I suspect the Thessalonian mourners found Paul’s words very solacing indeed.

The Impulse to Console

The impulse to offer consolation to mourners is with us still.

[Read more...]

Deception and the Hand of God

Can We Still Speak Credibly of Salvation?

 

by Russell Rathbun

Epistle Reading: Romans 10:5-15

For Sunday, August 7 , 2011: Year A—Ordinary 19

I feel like I should post about the Epistles every now and then. I don’t really like to. A lot of times they feel like essays about particular theological points or ethical exhortations that I am not really that interested in, but, you know, they are in the Bible, so….

Paul sure talks a lot…

Whenever I write about Romans in particular I’m struck by two things: 1) Paul sure talks a lot, and 2) Why isn’t there a more recent translation of Barth’s Epistle to the Romans? 1932 was a long time ago. Any Barth scholars out there? German translator, theology nerds? But I digress.

I like that Paul talks a lot, and he is never more interesting then in Romans, but this week’s Epistle reading leaves me searching for something to preach. In chapters 9-11, Paul is getting himself all twisted up trying to get Israel saved. He wants them to be saved, he is pretty sure God is saving them, he just needs to reason it out.

The thing that keeps getting in the way is that he wants them to confess that Jesus is Lord. And given that Jesus is the end of law, or that the law is contained within Jesus, somehow a devotion to the law could get them there—as long as they don’t interrupt the doing of the law, as Moses puts it, in some way that contradicts Paul and Barth.

[Read more...]

Hoping and Seeing: There’s No Sibling Rivalry Here

Why on earth do we think seeing hopes fulfilled would remove our hope?

by Danielle Shroyer

Epistle Reading: Romans 8:12-25

For Sunday, July 17, 2011: Year A—Ordinary 16

Oh, Paul. You do love run-on sentences, don’t you? They are so lovely in Greek, holding up that long line of endless-sentenced logical arguments stacking up like artfully poised Jenga pieces.

They are slightly less endearing, dare I say, in modern English. There are plenty of noteworthy bits in this chapter of Romans, with which many of us are overly familiar, but I’m just going to jump right to the end, right to my personal pet peeve, where we read this: “Now hope that is seen is not hope. For who hopes for what is seen?”

Well, Paul, I DO. I hope for what is seen ALL THE TIME.

Picking Sides?

I know this verse has gotten plenty of attention, because it’s a good rousing battle-cry when we find ourselves having to hope for something that’s nowhere in sight, and a long time coming. Like world peace. Or the Cubs winning the World Series. But I tend to feel it unfairly forces us to choose sides, as if hope and fulfillment are warring cousins, or rival siblings, requiring us to pick one over the other.

I’d argue, rather, that you can’t have one without the other. What kind of Easter would it have been without the women and disciples seeing the Risen Christ? We wouldn’t have resurrection hope at all if Jesus didn’t make himself seen and heard and poked and prodded and known over those next few days. And if Easter hope doesn’t count for Paul, how insane a definition of hope is that?!

[Read more...]

The Narrowing of the Gospel

Why are there four Gospels, but only one Acts?

by Russell Rathbun

First  Reading: Acts 2:1-21

For Sunday, June 12 , 2011: Year A – Day of Pentecost

The church is born fifty days after the resurrection, (pentecost means “fifty”), which is also the gestation period of crocodiles, goats and green beans. I don’t think too much significance should be drawn from that, but there might be something there.

Fifty Day Gestation?

More likely the fifty days echo the fifty days after the exodus the God gave Moses the Ten Commandments.  The Hebrews unanimously ratify this covenant with God and  Israel is born.

The church is born in Acts when a sound comes from heaven like a violent wind and tongues of fire descend on the disciples, filling them with the Holy Spirit and giving them the ability to speak so all could understand them in their native language.

Reversing Babel?

This text is sometimes read as the inverse of the tower of Babel story. In the Genesis story the people are one and speak one language. They put this unity to work to build a tower that will reach up to the heavens.

God doesn’t think this unity is such a good thing so God confounds their language and scatters them over the earth. This produces many peoples with many different ways of talking about who God is and what it means to be human.

[Read more...]

Kinda Sad

Can the privileged citizens of the empire proclaim the gospel of the oppressed?

by Russell Rathbun

Epistle Reading: 2 Timothy 4:6-8, 16-18

For Sunday, Oct. 24, 2010: Year C – Ordinary 30

This is kinda sad. When the Epistle readings are all full of ethical demands and righteous declarations, I find them a bit off-putting and uninspiring. They never really grab me; they turn me off. Not that I always need something zingy in the text to engage me, but I do like something that feels alive.

2 Timothy Feels Alive

After looking at this week’s Epistle lesson, I went back and read the whole letter. It is beautiful and sad. It is Paul, in jail, facing his impending execution.

There is poetry in this letter.

As for me, I am already being poured out as a libation, and the time of my departure has come.

There is a real, vulnerable person here. It is unfortunate that the Lectionariers left out verses 9-15, almost the best part of the whole book. Paul seems a little scared and lonely. He names those who have deserted him.

[Read more...]

Hiding with God and from Myself

If I am clothed with the new self, how do I make sense of the self I see in the mirror?

by Russell Rathbun

Epistle Reading: Colossians 3:1-11

For Sunday, August 1, 2010: Year C - Ordinary 18

I have spent much more time with the Gospels than I have the Epistles. The Gospels are stories. I like stories. I can understand stories better, especially if there are pictures. The Epistles seem like…what? Like theology. But not like the kind of theology I like — more like ethics.

Knock it Off!

Pretty much the basic premise of most of these letters is that a group of fledglings Christians in one city or another are doing something wrong, so they get a letter telling them to knock it off and then a prescription for how to do it right. Not surprisingly these letters easily lend themselves to sermons full of pull-yourselves-up-by-the-bootstraps righteousness. Rev. Nadia Bolz-Weber, in her gracious and hilarious book, Salvation on the Small Screen? 24 Hours of Christian Television, said that of the entire Bible verses quoted during the 24 consecutive hours that she watched TBN, over 85% were from the epistles. A lot of, this is what you have to do and not much of this is what Jesus has done.

Radical Grace

Of course there are other way to read these books, the ways Karl Barth and Martin Luther and I am sure you as well read them, that insists on the radical grace of God’s reconciling work in Christ. So in that general spirit, I read this week’s epistle as descriptive rather than prescriptive. It is not about what we should do or how we should live, but rather what has already been done for us and in us.

[Read more...]